Week 2 was really great to get back in to class and start working. I was put in a group with Kylie and Mark although Mark wasn’t there. As well as going through the theoretical side, we also got to go through some ideas we had about making our Documentary. Here are my notes from class:
“Life does not tell stories. Life is chaotic, fluid, random. It leaves myriads of ends untied, untidy. The writer can extract a story from life only by strict, close selection, and this must mean falsification. Telling stories really is telling lies.” – Jonathan Coe (2004)
Voice Overs
We had to discuss as a group whether voice overs are an inferior form of storytelling. I believed that voice overs may be more honest as with talking heads you can cut the footage to what you want and not the bits that agree with you however it then can become more biased as your have a script. In the terms of watching, it is easier to watch a documentary with a voice over as audiences are passive to the information they are given through sound and may restrict interpretation however if it it just images, you can translate them. Whether that makes it more inferior though is difficult to say. Narration bias is how you depict it, it is a flow of images rather than an image in a book that you can look at and consider.
Characteristics/Stereotypes of Narrators
– Formal
– Male
– Educated
– Detached
– Older
– Middle Class
Models of Narrative
Conflict Model
Classic narrative structure
Specific ideological approach
Opening – Equilibrium
Event – Disruption, recognition of event, attempt to repair damage
End – A new equilibrium
Inductive Model
Development over time, a story unfolds, gradually more information is revealed. An example of this model we were shown was the documentary ‘Lift’
Opening : introduce main characters/location/theme
Deductive Model
Opening: question/statement/thesis
All scenes relate to main question
Conclusion
Documentary occupies “a complex zone of representation in which the art of observing, responding, and listening must be combined with the art of shaping, interpreting, or arguing.” – Nichols, B (1997)